land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

re: study of bore and stroke

To: "Freiburger, David" <David.Freiburger@primedia.com>,
Subject: re: study of bore and stroke
From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:56:38 -0500
Okay lets start somewhere and move on from there... First off I want to know
how we are going to supply Fuel to this monster...( anything over a C
Motor )  is it going to be naturally aspirated, Nitrous, or is it going to
be super charged...  What is the design intent of the engine?  LSR, Street,
Drag racing?   Do I want bottom end Torque or do I want high RPM HP?

My understanding is somewhat limited but here's my take...

A longer stroke gives you a better bottom end and mid  range torque  ( good
for Drag racing? )

A shorter stroke keeps air flowing at higher RPM ranges and and reduces the
overall wieght of components... better High RPM hp?

Okay that's as far out on a limb as I'm climbing for the moment.

Keith



> Let's assume you've got two big-block Chevys, both with 11.0:1, both with
> the same solid-roller cam (253/260 at 0.050 on a 111), and both with the
> same heads, intake, carb, oil pan, and headers. Both engines are 489ci.
> However, one uses a bore and stroke of 4.55x3.766, and the other is
> 4.28x4.250. The rod-ratios are similar: the long-stroke is 1.53:1
> (6.535-inch rods), and the short-stroke is 1.63:1 (6.135-inch rods).
>
> What's the difference in the power curves and the required tuneup of these
> two engines and why?






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • re: study of bore and stroke, Keith Turk <=