Joe, that is an amazingly simple and sensible idea. I hope you are
successful.
If I was still active at Bonneville I would also submit an official request
for the same thing.
Good luck,
Bryan
Joe Amo wrote:
>my message was pure sarcasm, its really
>disturbing to me than many are put into
>your position
>
>I THINK RULE BOOKS SHOULD BE ISSUED
>DURING SPEEDWEEK, THEY WOULD BE THE NEW GOSPEL FOR THE UPCOMING YEAR,
>YOU WOULD HAVE RUN UNDER THE
>RULE BOOK ISSUED THE YEAR PRIOR
>
>Because you would have the new rule book in you hands
>at speedweek, by the end of that week after perusing it,
>you could get rule interpretations clarified on the spot
>with SCTA/BNI officials, and have the kind of effective
>discourse that is needed
>
>ANY VITAL SAFETY CHANGES THAT WERE DEEMED NECESSARY WOULD BE ANNOUNCED AS
>SAFETY SUPPLEMENTS, ON THE INTERNET,
>ON A DEDICATED SITE SUCH AS SCTA-BNI,
>BY AN ESTABLISED DATE SUCH AS DEC, THIS WOULD BE IN BOLD IN THE RULE BOOK,
>
>"SAFETY SUPPLEMENTS IF DEEMED NECESSARY, POSTED BY DEC ON SCTA-BNI.ORG"
>
> I mean if many are getting rule books toward end
>of May, then were almost already there, except we would have a year to work
>with new gospel, not a little over
>2 months, I THINK IT WOULD EVEN ENHANCE
>SAFETY AND WORKMANSHIP AS LESS TIME
>CONSTRAINED (HASTY) WORK CAN BE DONE
>
>and the hard work that the SCTA does in preparing new
>rules, would be less pressured as they would have all year
>to get the new book ready by speedweek time frame
>
>I will propose this via rules change process/form, for whatever it may be
>worthk, nothing ventured nothing
>gained
>
>''War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and
>degraded
>state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war
>is
>much worse.''
>---John Stewart Mill, 1859
>
>
>Joe :)
|