> If your idea of land speed racing is that it's got to remain true to it's
> roots or the way it was in X year... his article is spot on... but if you
> really go back to the ultimate purpose of this sport which is to explore
the
> outter edges of technology and truly have the fastest vehicle within the
> scope of what technology is avalible today.....
>
> I can see the logic on both sides of this topic... but remember the topic
> isn't traction control.... it's where do you want to draw the line in the
> salt when it comes to technology...
>
> The real question in my mind is WHY? Why would someone NOT want to employ
> the best and latest information? Why would someone force themselves to be
> handicapped by the past? Why is there a need to force your views on the
> rest of the competitors ( I'm speaking from an organizer's view ) WHY
NOT?
>
In that case we would only need one class;
AA /BFS
Jim in Palmdale
|