To: | Flowbench@aol.com, lsr_man@yahoo.com, land-speed@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Down Force Spoiler - - Aeronautics Question |
From: | Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com> |
Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:45:28 -0600 |
Mike, Why not? Rulebook says "Device on the rear upper portion of the body". Even the figure could well be the rear of the top. And the next question might be "Why not?". I think that Dick has a valid point. Skip At 04:58 PM 1/16/04 -0500, Flowbench@aol.com wrote: >In a message dated 1/16/04 12:46:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, >lsr_man@yahoo.com writes: > ><< Wouldn't it make more sense to use a smaller spoiler (maybe only 1" tall) >at the top of the rear window where the laminar flow is still tight against >the curve of the body? >> > >Dick, yep. But is it legal? Nope!! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Propster (non-LSR), dpulju |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Propster, Higginbotham Land Speed Racing |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Down Force Spoiler - - Aeronautics Question, Thomas E. Bryant |
Next by Thread: | Re: Down Force Spoiler - - Aeronautics Question, James Tone |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |