Dave,
You can't have it both ways. If it isn't traction control, it probably
isn't illegal. If it is traction control, it is cheating!
Merry Christmas to all
Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/CC
Dave Dahlgren wrote:
> It is just another example of large organizations trying to police what can
> not be done. It is silly and self serving at best at worst it is draconian..
> Consider endlessly being accused of something because Mr. or Ms. Secondplace
> starts accusing every that beats them of cheating.. The winner has the
> stigma of being a cheater and the Second Placer is redeemed. Worst yet no
> one knows who is right. It might be time to grow up and realize both
> personal and organizational limitations and just make it another tool in the
> toolbox. With multiple millions at their disposable NASCAR,CART,IRL and F1
> cannot police this issue. What in the world would make anyone think that
> SCTA/BNI can?
>
> As an aside to this it is still not traction control. It is tongue limiting
> and while it helps control traction it is still not traction control as it
> would be obvious to every one that there are electronic devices connected to
> the braking system. What it actually has to be is a slew rate rev limiter
> using timing control to keep the engine accel rate balanced.
>
> Dave
|