No apology needed here Jon... I fully understand your end of things. I just
think about these committee members and officials trying to get the rulebook
together and ready for print with the best of their ability and time. And I
imagine a dozen questions at a time and participants second guessing what may
or may not be a rule has got to slow them down and possibly create some
frustration. Hell I did it myself by posting what I did(we both mean well,
it's just that it's probably crunch time for the committees right now), so I
fully understand.
Todd-
From: Jon Wennerberg <jonw@up.net>
Subject: Re: M/C rules - LEATHERS
> I understand that getting correct and simple answers is best done by
> asking the correct (but not necessarily simple) people, so please,
> Todd and Dan, and anyone else, forgive me for implying anything
> else. i wasn't necessarily looking for definitive answers, rather
> was trying to further expose the questions so that more issues could
> be identified -- and so that when those with the definitive answers
> choose to offer them we'd be better able to see how they (the
> correct answers) apply to our many and varied situations.
>
> In other words, yeah -- I know that Tom Evans or Wink Eller are the
> guys to go to, not you. But now we've got more and better questions
> for them when they do expound.
>
> Jon
|