To: | John Burk <joyseydevil@comcast.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: rear suspention |
From: | Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net> |
Date: | Tue, 14 Oct 2003 04:34:22 -0400 |
This sounds like a NASCAR modified rear suspension.. How does the math work for the offset what are the units used give an example please. Dave Dahlgren > > A simpler > fix > ; use a single torque arm a little to the right of the drive shaft .The > offset > needs to be the torque arm length divided by the ring & pinion ratio . With > this design the torque arm exactly cancels the undesirable effects of drive > shaft torque , wheel loading stays equal under acceleration or deceleration > and roll stiffness can be as desired . The only drawback is wheel loading > is > unequal under braking . Only the torque arm should resist axel torque > (single > link on each side) and only the single links should locate the rear front to > rear . The front of the torque arm needs to be free front to rear (slot or > vertical link) so there is no torque arm arc to fight with the side link > arcs > . Hope my description is clear enough . John |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: The point of all of this junk..., Keith Turk |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: rear suspention rotation, Sparky |
Previous by Thread: | Fw: rear suspention, John Burk |
Next by Thread: | Re: rear suspention, Nt788 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |