Ain't legal, has rear steer and traction control
Glen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
To: <Want1937hd@aol.com>; <saltfevr@xmission.com>;
<land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: '51 Chev PU raft?
> The desire for freedom knows no bounds.
>
> K ( why yes I enjoyed that post a lot... )
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <Want1937hd@aol.com>
> To: <saltfevr@xmission.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:34 AM
> Subject: Re: '51 Chev PU raft?
>
>
> > In a message dated 7/24/03 10:01:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> > saltfevr@xmission.com writes:
> >
> > > http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20030723_2220.html
> > > Hey Nigel,maybe this would have been cheaper than the container
ship?Hey
> > > it would have already had the "salt" treatment.
> > >
> > > Tom Shannon
> > > Magna, Utah
> >
> > SEE, It pays to watch "Monster Garage" Bob in connecticut
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|