At 02:24 AM 5/14/03 -0500, you wrote:
>John S., Mayf:
>looks like the work that was done with the Phantom (what an airplane!) must
>have been a sort-of (more subtle) precursor to the cargo prototype that Mayf
>was talking about. Again, not something to lower Cd (like the helium
>envelope that started this thread).
>
>I really like the NASA/ Wright explanation of laminar & turbulent flow,
>boundary layers, Reynolds numbers, etc. Sure communicates better than my
>old college texts!
>Russ, #1226B
There was another project, but I can't find the data on it yet.
But as for the Phantom, got a .SIG that I saved from years ago..
from the days when our local Air Guard flew the RF-4C
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| The RF-4C Phantom
/0\ Living proof that if you put enough
\_______[|(.)|]_______/ engine on it..even a BRICK
o ++ 0 ++ o could fly! W. Weasel
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
/// what is needed. It isn't that difficult, folks.
|