land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Arfon's Aerodynamics, a thought.

To: DahMurf <dahmurf_xl@yahoo.com>,
Subject: Re: Arfon's Aerodynamics, a thought.
From: Twin Jugs Cycle <twinjugsharley@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 12:47:38 -0800 (PST)
Very good point of a vehicle not spinning like the
ball Deb, i never really thought about that. And good
question, Could it be that it's not as relevant
without spinning? 

I think(is that considered theory?) the main reason
for the dimples are because, With a teardrop tail
section....  the ball wouldn't roll very well.  ;-)

There's alot of thought on loft too as I remember a
teacher in school showing there was now way to hit a
smooth ball of the same material, size and weight near
as far due to it not coming down as fast(we proved you
could break a window with either one). I still think
it has more to do with not being able to find a good
place for an aerodynamic advantage on the backside(?)
of the ball.

Let's hope we don't use a bike to find out(spinning
and landspeed are 2 words that do not go good
together). And yes it was a combination of Corbin and
S&S I think.
Todd Dross
1300b


> Exactly when do the dimples
> provide benefit - while rotating or not?
> Murf
> #1301b M/PG-250
> Twin Jugs Racing


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
///  what is needed.  It isn't that difficult, folks.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>