land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: fans

To: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>
Subject: Re: fans
From: "dpulju" <dpulju@usintouch.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 09:52:54 -0800
I asked the question because i wanted to know which type would move the most
air to cool a radiator or trans cooler with the least amount of draw for a
dead battery system. Electric motors being the same.
Dale
Sunny windy and 62 in pahrump
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clay, Dale" <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>
To: "'dpulju'" <dpulju@usintouch.com>; "Land-Speed"
<land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: Fans


> I think this is sort of  a trick question.  The primary design criteria
for
> a sub propeller is noise reduction, not necessarily efficiency.  When I
was
> in the USCG I was sent to Hamilton Standard propeller school and they said
> the most efficient propeller they ever played with was a one bladed model!
>
> Dale C.
>
>
> To: Land-Speed
> Subject: Fans
>
> OK, which fan is more efficient, the nuclear sub prop design
> or the standard
> airplane prop type?
> dale
> dark and 60 in pahrump

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
///  what is needed.  It isn't that difficult, folks.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>