land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Fw: Rear suspension

To: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: Fw: Rear suspension
From: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 09:09:29 -0500
Gee will it have a mass suspended with unsprung weight and no damping? What
would be the damper in the suspension you propose? I have a great experiment to
show how well this would work as a shock/damper. Go get one of those big red
playground balls they use for 'kickball' and 'dodgeball' in elementry school,
now bounce it....... 
it's a bladder filled with air made out of rubber...

Dave Dahlgren

john robinson wrote:
> 
> Howdy,
>           I run a short wheel base Dodge Colt, solid suspension, and it is
> a rough ride @ 144MPH. I always thought that a small amount of compliance
> would help, something on the order of an inch or so. And am now designing a
> 'liner with the air pucks in it for suspension.
>          Question....with the air suspension pucks, ( I think they are
> machine mounts, you know, the rubber hockey puck thingys that are air
> pressurized)
>          Am I required to use a shock at each corner that has these units
> mounted as suspension per the rule II-4 ?  or do they qualify as both
> suspension and shock?
> 
>               John Robinson, Mechanician

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///  To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
///  with nothing in it but
///
///     unsubscribe land-speed
///
///  or go to  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>