What the devil is this about? Is it Gribb's Thunderbird doesn't fit a class?
What about Oval Track Class in some form? Or Competition Coupe? I have EVERY
respect in the world for you Dan but "it's been this way for years and should
stay that way" may not be the best way to do things these days. Change is
good, most of the time. Why couldn't someone run on 110 octane gas? Was there
a reasonable explanation? Sue the SCTA? I would have shown the man the way to
the exit!
Just an ignorant opionion, John Backus
----- Original Message -----
From: Dan Warner
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:45 PM
To: land speed
Subject: varity of classes
Those classes are precious. I can't imagine
eliminating them or any others simply to save a single line in the records
book.
*******************************
Dan & list,
My point exactly!!
There are classes with existing records with no entries - build and race
there. No need to add to the database when no interest exist for what is
currently available.
Another example is the discussion I had at the lakebed last Sunday. The guy I
was talking with said he was not going to conform to the "event gas" rule
because ERC did not have the octane rating he wanted to use. When I told him
that he could not record in that manner he insisted that he would take the
SCTA-BNI to court. I asked him if he had spoken to Rick at ERC about his
products, he said no he had not. The point here is should the procedure be
changed for one person when it has worked well for several years?
DW
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
/// or go to http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///
|