land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Maxton Motorcycle engine class question

To: "Dale & Evelyn Thomas" <bikerschoice@worldnet.att.net>,
Subject: Re: Maxton Motorcycle engine class question
From: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 20:03:09 -0800
All I wanted to point out to you Dale was that the rules were made by
motorcycle riding participants not, by car guys who you implied didn't know
the difference and didn't care.
Jim

----- Original Message -----
From: Dale & Evelyn Thomas <bikerschoice@worldnet.att.net>
To: Jim Dincau <jdincau@qnet.com>; Dale <Dale@prodigy.net>;
<land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: Maxton Motorcycle engine class question


> Jim,
>   I am not bashing the S.C.T.A. or anyone else. Just stating obvious
> differences in rules for those who asked.  It does raise the question of
> common sense and fair application of the rules. Gas and fuel, naturally
> aspirated and blown are all recognized as obvious differences or
advantages.
> It just seems that someone would have applied the same logic between a
> engine design that makes power every second stoke and runs a gas/oil
mixture
> to one that makes power every fourth stroke and burns just plain gas. Not
> opinion,  just plain observation of the facts.
>    Not to impugn anyone's knowledge , but some people just don't know the
> differences , some don't know the inherent advantages of the differences ,
> some don't care and some will just say it is too late to change.
>
> Dale Thomas
>    O.F.O.S  Racing. Crew Chief and wealth of useless information. (just
ask
> my wife)

///
///  land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>