To: | "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: NOS Question |
From: | "Ed Van Scoy" <edvs@uswest.net> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Jan 2001 19:31:47 -0700 |
Agree 100% Ed Dave Dahlgren wrote: > I would personally think that the engine compartment or any > place that gets very hot is the worst place for a pressure > vessel.. Kinda why they have the blow off valve... The odds > of the bottle bursting are mighty slim with the blow off > valve vented to the outside.. I would personally think that > every bottle that has blown up has had a tampered with blow > off. The physics behind how they work is just too reliable > to fail under any kind off normal installation. I think idea > of a container ie. metal box was a good one. Why the change > again? what test data has some one come up with or what > failure of this device occured that prompts the new change? > has there been an occurance of the box blowing up too and > giving way? The box in keith Turks car was much thicker and > offered more protection than any of the 'firewalls' I have > ever seen at B'ville. > Dave Dahlgren > > [This message delayed, as it needed manual intervention by the list > administrator. mjb.] /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list /// |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: NOS Question, Ed Van Scoy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | chat line, LGMCAFEE |
Previous by Thread: | Re: NOS Question, Ed Van Scoy |
Next by Thread: | Re: NOS Question, Ed Van Scoy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |