To: | DOUG ODOM <popms@thegrid.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Parachute |
From: | Wester S Potter <wspotter@jps.net> |
Date: | Sun, 05 Nov 2000 10:03:28 -0800 |
Doug, List, That would seem to make lots of sense ... softening the jerk on the initial hit. LSR cars don't have the luxury of lots of storage space for longer tethers but the stretch on the line could be a shock absorber type of thing. Sure are a lot of rubber bands on the course beyond the five that once held lines in place. Had some second hand experience with parachutes in the National Guard ... they had the Special Forces units in Utah jumping chutes designed for sea level. Lots of injuries from hard hits. Ten years later someone mentioned that there was a different, larger, high altitude chute designed for jumps above 3500 feet ... quick switch, LOTS fewer injuries. Wonder about the stopping at say Denver as opposed to sea level drag strips? The salt is 4200 feet. You'd think that chutes designed for sea level would still be okay there. Just not as effective at stopping but not so hard on shrouds and tethers. Wes |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Parachute, Glen Barrett |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: FW: USFRA Race Dates for 2001, Beverly Stanley |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Parachute, Glen Barrett |
Next by Thread: | Re: Parachute, Jim Dincau |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |