land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug Catcher Question

To: George Mitchell <americanpartner@yahoo.com>,
Subject: Bug Catcher Question
From: George Mitchell <americanpartner@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2000 19:35:30 -0800 (PST)
I might have found a good deal on an injector hat(
endrelie , I think) It's a bug catcher , been run on a
355 inch street small block on gas. Is it worth
getting for the 300 inch hemi motor and sending off to
get set up  or should I just buy a new one set
specifically for the combination.
I bought the sheet metal for the intake last week , by
the way. It will be much easier that building a Chevy
one -- No distributor angle to figure out .Just a
valley pan and the runner length and angles .I will
build a carb top and an injector top.  ah -- a high
tech dinosaur.

 Many questions tonight .
 
 Is there any easy way to slow down a pinto rack and
pinion?

The porsche isn't a roller yet but it is getting close
...
 George in DC  

--- George Mitchell <americanpartner@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hey list  I have some of those newbie questions.
> 
>  I am going to be taking advantage of as much belly
> pan as possible in the Porsche "thing". I was
> wondering about the lower a arms  though .
>  On the one hand I figured that making a small
> covering for the bottom of the lower a arms would be
> a
> good idea. When the car is at ride height it would
> be
> one continuous pan. 
> Two thoughts crossed my mind 
>  Wouldn't there have to be some sort of pressure
> release for the air that could make its way into the
> "nose" ? There is no way to seal it up tight and
> still
> have some sort of suspension travel -- Right ? I
> would
> think a bump would suddenly fill the nose with a
> sudden stream of air and cause some problems
> 
> Also whats to keep that little "a arm belly pan "
> from
> creating lift if it should come out of the airstream
> with suspension movement? I know the salt isn't like
> a
> pool table so the suspension will have some travel .
> 
> I guess another alternative is to run a continuous
> pan
> with the a arm pick up points within that area (
> nose
> )with just a space for the wheels to move . Still
> you
> have the pressure problem , though. 
> 
>  What are people running in full belly pan cars ?
> 
> 
> 
> I know some people didn't like it but I have watched
> the LSR special like four times now. 
> 
> 
> Anyway , your input would help me in this belly pan
> thing .
>  
> Skip in FLA a check for $200 (half) on those Hemis
> is
> going out tomarrow.I'll get the rest to you in a
> week
> or so .  
> 
> George in a chilli DC  
> 
> --- Phillip Landry <saltracer@netscape.net> wrote:
> > Keith,
> > I believe it's Dave Haller who's the trouble
> maker!
> > Phil
> > 
> > 
> > "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net> wrote:
> > hey Guys... Now and again we might want to change
> > the heading's to keep them
> > on Track with what we are saying....
> > 
> > This deal on Dampners may be good for the
> Archieves
> > one day....
> > 
> > Keith
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Chris R Harris <yesford@clear.net.nz>
> > To: David Haller <dhaller@techline.com>;
> > <ARDUNDOUG@aol.com>;
> > <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2000 5:18 PM
> > Subject: Re: Cam Doctor problems
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >            yes, I very definitely consider the
> > suggestion to run without a
> > > harmonic damper, bad advice. I thoroughly
> > researched this subject some
> > time
> > > ago and wrote a tech article for a magazine on
> the
> > subject.
> > > Certainly some people run without them,
> generally
> > looking for more rapid
> > > engine acceleration such as on dirt track ovals
> > etc. Rather than go into
> > > immense details of what the engine damaging,
> down
> > side is, simply look at
> > > some of the fastest accelerating door cars
> around.
> > NHRA Pro Stock,
> > > acceleration is the total priority (given
> traction
> > of course), they very
> > > definitely run dampers, despite their short
> blasts
> > of sub 7 seconds.
> > >
> > > Chris Harris.  New Zealand.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----------
> > > > From: David Haller <dhaller@techline.com>
> > > > To: Chris R Harris <yesford@clear.net.nz>;
> > ARDUNDOUG@aol.com;
> > > land-speed@autox.team.net
> > > > Subject: Re: Cam Doctor problems
> > > > Date: Sunday, March 19, 2000 1:04 PM
> > > >
> > > > You lost me Chris. Is it your opinion that is
> > straight bogus advice and
> > I
> > > > need pay no attention?
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Dave Haller #93
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Chris R Harris <yesford@clear.net.nz>
> > > > To: David Haller <dhaller@techline.com>;
> > <ARDUNDOUG@aol.com>;
> > > > <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2000 3:30 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Cam Doctor problems
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Dave,
> > > > >         Whoever gave you that tip, consider
> > them a friend, or advice
> > no
> > > > > more.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chris Harris.  NZ.
> > > > >
> > > > > ----------
> > > > > > From: David Haller <dhaller@techline.com>
> > > > > > To: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com;
> > land-speed@autox.team.net
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Cam Doctor problems
> > > > > > Date: Sunday, March 19, 2000 9:25 AM
> > > > > >
> > > > > > List,
> > > > > > Working on the car this last Thursday
> > evening the discussion came up
> > > on
> > > > > the
> > > > > > need for a harmonic balancer on my small
> > block. I have one of those
> > > > > > expensive ones on it now and was told I do
> > not need to have one on
> > > the
> > > > > > engine and to run without it. It was
> claimed
> > the balancer is robbing
> > > me
> > > > > of
> > > > > > horsepower unnecessarily, that the engine
> > was already balanced
> > > besides
> > > > > real
> > > > > > run time was short so the need for one was
> > not there. What is your
> > > > > > experience and opinions out there, I know
> > you have the right ones,
> > > > > > Dave Haller #93 C/GAlt
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: <ARDUNDOUG@aol.com>
> > > > > > To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 7:23 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Cam Doctor problems
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In a message dated 02/29/2000 3:17:23 AM
> > Pacific Standard Time,
> > > > > > > dahlgren@uconect.net writes:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > << There is a product i am not sure if
> you
> > are aware of called the
> > > Cam
> > > > > > >  Doctor(I am not sure who makes this)
> and
> > Cam Pro Plus made by
> > > Audie
> > > > > > >  technology that does what you want to
> do
> > it also will do all the
> > > > input
> > > > > > >  for you. It is made for exactly what
> you
> > want to do. basically
> > you
> > > > put
> 
=== message truncated ===


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>