land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Drivetrain losses

To: "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com>, <SaltyCuda@aol.com>,
Subject: Re: Drivetrain losses
From: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:42:06 -0500
Almost every other rear is more efficient than the Ford 9", but not
necessarily stronger.

John Beckett, LSR #79

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
To: <SaltyCuda@aol.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: Drivetrain losses


>
>
> --- SaltyCuda@aol.com wrote:
> > I read in a catalog, I believe it was Somer's
> > Bros., that the mopar 8 3/4"
> > rear end was more efficient than a Ford 9".
> > Something about the geometric
> > relationship between the pinion gear and the
> > ring gear.????
> >
> > Jim aka Salty 'cuda
> >
> I been a Mopar Man since hemis were invented.
> The 8 3/4 mopar rear is better - but you can get
> more ratios for the Ford.
>
>
> =====
> Dick J
> in east Texas
> ECTA #72  FX/GMR
> Do You Yahoo!?




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>