This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0374491634129242950==
boundary="------------C17A24627A6DF1227F298550"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------C17A24627A6DF1227F298550
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I have no data--and, probably, no credibility--but I recall reading
somewhere the rear mount is located a smidge outboard of the front
mount. This, I believe, cants the trunnion end--the point of the
'A'--towards the front of the car a bit and creates the little bit of
caster angle our cars have.
On 2/17/2020 7:20 PM, Harold Manifold wrote:
> I may have answered too quickly. I found another chassis layout in my
> archives. It appears the A arm mounts are 90 degrees to the frame rail
> but it looks like the the front mount is slightly higher than the
> rear. We may need other opinions.
> Harold
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Healeys [mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net] *On Behalf Of
> *S and T Miller
> *Sent:* Monday, February 17, 2020 6:30 PM
> *To:* healeys@autox.team.net
> *Subject:* [Healeys] A-arm frame mounts specs
>
> Anyone know the factory a-arm frame mount specs in degrees? One would
> assume 90 degrees when using a digital angle finder on the back side, but?
>
> The Millers
>
> "Always drive them, but remember each drive in an antique car is a
> test drive."
--------------C17A24627A6DF1227F298550
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
I have no data--and, probably, no credibility--but I recall reading
somewhere the rear mount is located a smidge outboard of the front
mount. This, I believe, cants the trunnion end--the point of the
'A'--towards the front of the car a bit and creates the little bit
of caster angle our cars have.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/17/2020 7:20 PM, Harold Manifold
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:E4EE4B6F476E4413ABBB0DF884EEEEFD@AllInOne">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 11.00.10570.1001">
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="098561603-18022020"><font
size="2" face="Arial" color="#0000ff">I may have answered
too quickly. I found another chassis layout in my archives.
It appears the A arm mounts are 90 degrees to the frame rail
but it looks like the the front mount is slightly higher
than the rear. We may need other opinions.</font></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span
class="098561603-18022020"></span> </div>
<div dir="ltr" align="left"><span class="098561603-18022020"><font
size="2" face="Arial" color="#0000ff">Harold</font></span></div>
<br>
<div class="OutlookMessageHeader" dir="ltr" lang="en-us"
align="left">
<hr tabindex="-1">
<font size="2" face="Tahoma"><b>From:</b> Healeys
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net">mailto:healeys-bounces@autox.team.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>S
and T Miller<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, February 17, 2020 6:30 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:healeys@autox.team.net">healeys@autox.team.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Healeys] A-arm frame mounts specs<br>
</font><br>
</div>
Anyone know the factory a-arm frame mount specs in degrees? One
would assume 90 degrees when using a digital angle finder on the
back side, but?<br>
<br>
The Millers<br>
<br>
"Always drive them, but remember each drive in an antique car is a
test drive."
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------C17A24627A6DF1227F298550--
--===============0374491634129242950==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/healeys http://autox.team.net/archive
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
--===============0374491634129242950==--
|