healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

[Healeys] BJ7 or BJ8

Subject: [Healeys] BJ7 or BJ8
From: healey100m at me.com (Randall Hicks)
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 10:40:37 -0400
References: <000001d3ea4c$a43b9a60$ecb2cf20$@eastlink.ca> <017501d3eab5$27c10e20$77432a60$@rr.com> <9fac25a0-334d-5417-196a-8e49a421ee88@earthlink.net>
There is some evidence that the stamping of chassis numbers started with late 
BJ7?s but no start date or body number has been determined. Regardless, the 
number would indicate a BJ7 or BJ8.

Randy

> On May 13, 2018, at 9:24 AM, Bob Haskell <rchaskell at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> One possible tell might be if there is a VIN number on the right hand shock 
> tower.  Weren't those just on the BJ8s?  All, or after some point in time?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bob Haskell
> AHCA 3000 MkI registrar
> http://www.ciahc.org/registry_3000mk1.php
> 
> On 05/13/2018 08:23 AM, BJ8Healeys wrote:
>> Brian, I have seen a car recently that was advertised for sale by Beverly 
>> Hills Car Club as a BJ7.  It had a wood dash, BJ8 "short tail" center 
>> console (but no armrest), BJ8 front seats and door panels, BJ7 rear seat 
>> upholstery and BJ7 backrest.  The external features were either BJ7 or Phase 
>> 1 BJ8.  The car had a BJ7 VIN.  It was not possible to determine whether the 
>> car began life as a BJ7 or Phase 1 BJ8.
>> I am aware of one other car that was created by Fourintune out of two junked 
>> BJ8s and they put a BJ7 VIN plate on it and sold it to someone in New York 
>> state.  This car later came to North Carolina and was sold after the bond 
>> period expired.  The new owner had some problems registering the car with 
>> the NY BJ7 number because of the discrepancies.
>> Steve Byers
>> HBJ8L/36666
>> BJ8 Registry
>> AHCA Delegate at Large
>> Havelock, NC
>> *From:*Healeys [mailto:healeys-bounces at autox.team.net] *On Behalf Of 
>> *Brian Drab
>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 12, 2018 7:55 PM
>> *To:* Healeys at autox.team.net
>> *Subject:* [Healeys] BJ7 or BJ8
>> I currently manage the AHOABC monthly newsletter and website. In that 
>> capacity I received a request to list a new members car for sale.  He lives 
>> in another town about 400 kms from Vancouver where I live. When he joined 
>> the club, he listed his car as a 1963 BJ7.
>> This is the car he wishes to sell. He has owned it since 1975. He advised 
>> that he had the car restored several years ago. He sent me a number of high 
>> quality photos of the car. The car is beautiful example of a big Healey and 
>> looks gorgeous.
>> The first thing that stood out to me was the car had a wood BJ8 dash. In 
>> addition, it has a BJ8 exhaust system. The interior pictures showed a BJ8 
>> style armrest. Under the hood, the horns are mounted BJ8 style.
>> There is no voltage regulator to check whether it is new or old style as the 
>> car has been equipped with an alternator.
>> The car is badged with a 3000 MKII badge above the grill. The car has all 
>> BJ7 style lights. The rear seat, which on a BJ8 unfolds to make a luggage 
>> carrier, is BJ7 style.
>> When I emailed back that it appeared to be a BJ8 and not a BJ7 he emailed me 
>> a copy of the heritage certificate. The certificate definitely lists a BJ7 
>> with a manufacturing date of the 1 - 7 June 1962.
>> Other than the car being a hybrid formed from two cars - BJ7 and a BJ8 I am 
>> at a loss to explain it.
>> Anyone experienced anything like this?
>> Brian Drab


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>