--===============4300479176308171629==
--B_3532090465_757169
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Healeys] 100-4 BN1 side screens
No, that's the real deal. I suppose they were too expensive so Austin
changed to the jury rigged crap we are all familiar with. They did say the
change was made because these didn't allow the driver to use hand signals.
Also getting the door open with these in place had to be a trick. I still
want some.
Bill Lawrence
BN1-554
I once cut the rear and upper half off my BN.4 side screens and used the
remaining standard frame to fit a one piece perspex screen that I cut to
make a tighter fit in the soft top flap as I did regular 700 mile round
trips ( back in 1960s when it was my daily driver )
I returned to the standard sidescreen layout because the one piece was hot
and could not be opened to cool, it was difficult to reply to police on
those rare ocassion that sought my response and toll payment and car park
payments were not possible.
But they do look clean and modern and would look great at display days
Joe
PS My BJ.8 has sidescreens and suits the car!
--B_3532090465_757169
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html><head></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: s=
pace; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size:=
14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><div><br></div><div><br></div><sp=
an id=3D"OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div><div style=3D"word-wrap: break-word;
-webkit=
-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0=
); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; "><div><br></div><div>=
<br></div><span id=3D"OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><div style=3D"font-family:Calibri;
f=
ont-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BOR=
DER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT=
: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP=
: 3pt"><span style=3D"font-weight:bold">Subject: </span> Re: [Healeys] 100-4 B=
N1 side screens<br></div><div><br></div><div><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type"=
content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"><style type=3D"text/css"
style=3D"displ=
ay:none;"><!-- P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} --></style><div dir=3D"ltr"><=
div id=3D"divtagdefaultwrapper"
style=3D"font-size:12pt;color:#000000;background=
-color:#FFFFFF;font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"><p>No, that'=
s the real deal. I suppose they were too expensive so Austin changed to the =
jury rigged crap we are all familiar with. They did say the change was made =
because these didn't allow the driver to use hand signals. Also getting the =
door open with these
in place had to be a trick. I still want some.</p><p><br></p><p>Bill Lawre=
nce</p><p>BN1-554</p><br><br><div style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><div><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_extra">I once cut the rear and upper half off my BN.4 side screens=
and used the remaining standard frame to fit a one piece perspex screen tha=
t I cut to make a tighter fit in the soft top flap as I did regular 700 mile=
round trips ( back in 1960s when it was my daily driver )</div></div></div>=
</div></div></div></span><div>I returned to the standard sidescreen layout b=
ecause the one piece was hot and could not be opened to cool, it was d=
ifficult to reply to police on those rare ocassion that sought my response a=
nd toll payment and car park payments were not possible. </div><div><br=
></div><div>But they do look clean and modern and would look great at displa=
y days</div><div>Joe</div><div>PS My BJ.8 has sidescreens and suits the car!=
</div></div></div></span></body></html>
--B_3532090465_757169--
--===============4300479176308171629==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
--===============4300479176308171629==--
|