healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] PVC value question

To: warthodson@aol.com, jmsdarch@sbcglobal.net, healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] PVC value question
From: warthodson@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:58:35 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: mharc@autox.team.net
Delivered-to: healeys@autox.team.net
References: <6.2.3.4.2.20121215161300.0205c3e8@pop.att.yahoo.com> <8CFA9A733AE5C90-5E8-16570@Webmail-d109.sysops.aol.com>
That should have been PCV (not PVC).
Gary Hodson


-----Original Message-----
From: warthodson <warthodson@aol.com>
To: jmsdarch <jmsdarch@sbcglobal.net>; healeys <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sun, Dec 16, 2012 7:20 am
Subject: Re: [Healeys] PVC value question


In my opinion either location will provide positive crankcase ventilation. My
related question is what purpose does adding the valve into the PVC serve?
Gary Hodson


-----Original Message-----
From: john spaur <jmsdarch@sbcglobal.net>
To: healeys <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sat, Dec 15, 2012 6:17 pm
Subject: [Healeys] PVC value question


An article on John Sim's website shows the installation of a PVC
valve. However, the vacuum source is from the intake manifold on the
front carburetor for a tri-carb.

Why can't the vacuum source come from the rear carb air filter where
the existing crankcase ventilation hose connects?

Thank you,

John Spaur
'62 BT7
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys

http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/warthodson@aol.com
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys

http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/warthodson@aol.com
_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>