Safety Gauge Guys,
Here is more safety gauge data to confuse you guys further.
Both cars purchased new by my Father. Delivered to USA. Safety gauges never
replaced.
BN1 Built Jan 1954 X.42638/35 0--100 psig 30--100 deg Celsius
BN2 Built Mar 1956 X.42638/38 0--100 psig 90--230 deg Fahrenheit
Through that data into the soup & draw conclusions.
Craig Rice
Central Indiana
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Dimmock" <austin.healey@gmail.com>
To: <dwflagg@juno.com>
Cc: <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Smiths Gauge
> Hey Doug,
>
> O.K. So If the Smiths number is so close to a 100/4, and an MG, why is
> your guage in Celcius?
> In 1954 who used Celcius? Rather than farenheight?
> So it has to be for a French car????? Or????
>
> Dunno.
> Chris
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 02/02/2012, at 12:40 PM, dwflagg@juno.com wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> I believe this to be an original dash gauge and not a supplementary
>> Smiths gauge. The supplementary gauges, I believe would be designated
>> TG.
>> The original AH100 fuel gauge was X 49422/219 and was later superceded
>> by
>> a FG number. The original 100s oil temp gauge is X 20933/139, later
>> replaced by TG 1502/17. This is why I think the gauge I have was an
>> original installation.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Doug
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
|