Thanks a bunch for the info here.
What I have is the same as Chris Dimmock, and a set of later large
breather tri-carb manifold to fit HD8 or HD6 carbs. They have bigger
stuff on the underside than the HS6 used on tri-carbs. I also have the
SS Falcon works style headers that need some clearance on the footwell
side.
I really wanted to see how the chassis area looks withe frame and
footwell modifications, so this is all very helpful.
Here's the engine with manifolds for HD type carbs:
http://www.team.net/forums/download/file.php?id=62
Wilko
On Jul 6, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> If you browse this section of my website you will find several
> photos of the
> needed modification:
> http://www.concourshealeys.com/hello-world/
> This modification lets you use the original type of manifold for
> triple
> Webers.
>
> Magnus Karlsson
> www.concourshealeys.com
>
> 6 jul 2011 kl. 06:54 skrev "PG" <britishcars@shaw.ca>:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> When you say "Australian manifold" for the triple DCOE, you may
>> mean the
>> Warenford.
>>
>> Regardless, I run the triple Weber manifold and while it's tight, I
>> can fit
>> the manifold with short stacks on without modifying the pedalbox.
>> That
>> being said, I have friends that have modified the pedal box area so
>> that
>> they can fit a cold air box in
>>
>> Those that have modified the pedal box have managed to do so without
>> affecting the pedals. They simply cut away a bit of the box near
>> the brake
>> and clutch master cylinders and make room.
>>
>> I know its' not much but my advice would be to fit the DCOE's and
>> see if
> you
>> really need a new pedalbox.
>>
>> Paul
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|