Does anyone know at what chassis number a change occurred with the top
frames, going from a smaller cross section tube to larger, heavier
tubes? There may be a difference in geometry too.
This would be with the removable frames for a BT7, or maybe BN4.
A friend had a lighter frame on his 3000 Mk. I and his top would not fit
on it right, so maybe the geometry is different.
Thanks
Charlie
On 6/6/2011 12:27 PM, S and T Miller wrote:
> Hello all, I am requesting a favor. I bought a late 100-6/ early 3000 top
> frame from Carlisle Import swap meet this year with the legs cut off. This is
> the type with the bent legs and tapered bottom section. I want to fabricate
> the legs, but need a close up/ side view picture of this type of top frame
> from the pivot points down. From the picture I should be able to calculate
> the measurements/ bends of the missing legs. So I need a really clear
> complete (in one picture) straight on shot of the lower half. Would also need
> some part of the rectangle folding pieces in the picture so that I could also
> use that as a "known" measurement.
> Thanks, Shawn
>
> The Millers
> "British Car Nuts"
>
> 1957 Austin Healey 100-6 BN4 35299
>
> 1959 Austin Healey 100-6 BN4 77219
>
> 1964 MGB 40841
>
> 1960 Austin Healey Bugeye Sprite AN5 34351
>
> "Always drive them, but remember each drive in an antique car is a test
> drive."
> _______________________________________________
> Healeys at autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation $12.75
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/healeys/mgcharlie
> at comcast.net
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of
mgcharlie.vcf]
|