Subject: | [Healeys] Rust removal analysis (long) |
---|---|
From: | pajtamuvek at gmail.com (Austin Healey) |
Date: | Sun, 3 Apr 2011 21:19:33 +0200 |
References: | <45864DB570884C87BE7135FAD37915AE@TM1> <BANLkTi=NnT0cDhpGP0L8cpLnX-xzQWc=kQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Tadeusz, Sand blasting is a "neccesary evil" thing. No other treatments can substitute it. For safety I have 2 parties for my sand blastings: one for "rough" jobs where they can make no much harm - for cheap money, and a "master level" maiestro, who can warrant a harmless and 100% job - for a big price though. Sand blasting can be harmless if in good hands, and of course cause severe damage if applied badly. All other methods - except dipping in accid, which I have never tried - are only secondary (on places where sanding is not possible for example). Greetings: Gergo |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Healeys] Rust removal analysis (long), Austin Healey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Healeys] Rust removal analysis (long), john spaur |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Healeys] Rust removal analysis (long), Austin Healey |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Healeys] Rust removal analysis (long), john spaur |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |