healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Healeys] Austin Healey Barbie clock radio

To: John Harper <ah@jharper.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Austin Healey Barbie clock radio
From: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 06:19:20 -0700
That is interesting--may come in handy if I ever get a ride in the Cash 
Cab.  But, I've never heard of it happening in the States.

I'm not sufficiently well-versed in electronic theory to know how 
lowering the frequency can lower consumption.   If so, that means the 
50Hz system is more efficient and perhaps we should change to it.

Power is a function of voltage and current, but there may be a frequency 
factor in the RMS computation for AC.  Any EE's on the List care to explain?

bs


John Harper wrote:
>
> Bob
>
> You might be interested to know that during WWII in West London we 
> regularly experienced a drop in frequency during the day. We were told 
> that this was a method of lowering power consumption. It was not much 
> and presumable within legal limits but by the evening synchronous 
> electric clocks could be up to 8 minutes slow. However by the morning 
> they would be correct so presumably the frequency would be above the 
> nominal 50Hz (or should I say 50 cps as they were then) during the night.
>
> We did not have a National Grid at that time but I believe that all 
> London power stations were linked together.
>
> Regards
>


-- 
*******************************************************************
Bob Spidell           San Jose, CA            bspidell@comcast.net

*******************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>