Just because it's a forgotten prototype doesn't mean its worth some crazy
price. If this was my car, I'd get rid of the portholes and replace it with
something more attractive.
I do like the door handles, though, very small. 1/4 lights are interesting,
but at the same time I'm glad they eventually kept the roadster set up
rather than putting in roll up windows.
Alan
'52 A90
'53 BN1
'59 Jag Mk IX
'64 BJ8
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Derek Job <derek.c.job@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I attach a link to an ad for the sale of a '100-Six Protoype'. The car is
> being sold by Murray Scott-Nelson a well known UK Healey dealer. The car is
> supposedly based on a BN1 that was extensively modified by the experimental
> department and then according to its Heritage Certificate was sold new as
> a
> prototype BN4 in October 1956.
>
> I have never heard of such a car before and would be interested in hearing
> the views of the experts out there. The car is obviously different from
> Patrick's BN3, but there were supposedly four BN3 chassis of which only
> two
> are known to exist, both featured in Bill Emerson's book, one being
> Patricks
> of course.
>
> Any chance this is one of the other two?
>
> Link is
>
> http://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C119111/
>
>
>
> cheers
>
> Derek
> _______________________________________________
> Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Healeys@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
>
> You are subscribed as healey.nut@gmail.com
>
> http://www.team.net/archive
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
http://www.team.net/archive
|