In the BJ8 Registry, I have many examples of certificates with incorrect data
-- obvious mistakes on some, and more than one example of certificates obtained
for the same car at two different times that do not have identical information.
Transcription of the build data from the microfilmed build records to the
certificates leaves room for human error, but considering what is being charged
for the certs now, one would think that more care would be taken and mistakes
would be more infrequent than they are.
BMIHT will replace a cert that can be shown to be in error. However, in at
least one case I know of, BMIHT refused to correct an obvious error in a body
number because the error itself was in the build records.
Andy Pole has said he called BMIHT about the LWB on the cert in question, but
without the identification of the chassis number Richard Brotherton had no idea
what the letters mean. I will forward Andy the number and hopefully he will
try again. If BMIHT comes up with an explanation, I'll let the list know.
Until then, everything else is just speculation. I was hoping that maybe
someone else had a cert with the same letters, but no one has yet said they do.
Thanks for all the responses.
Steve Byers
HBJ8L/36666
BJ8 Registry
Havelock, NC USA
---- Josef.Eckert@t-systems.com wrote:
> I guess it is just a mistake (printing error) in the certificate. I know
> several certificates with wrong data. I have one for my car showing disk
> wheels the car never had. I second check in the BMIHT books showed
> clearly the car was delivered with wire wheels. I have two different
> certificates for the car now.
>
> Josef Eckert
> Koenigswinter/GERMANY
> 54BN1, 62BT7, 65Sprite
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
http://www.team.net/archive
|