Hi Rudy,
I'll be able to make that meeting. How about we vote to
dissolve the club and disperse the remaining funds as we feel
appropriate?
OK, I'll extract my tongue from where it was stuck in
my cheek. However rather than lower the standards for a quorum my only
question would be if other methods of obtaining it were explored. As
mentioned proxies are one way.. But there are others also.
In this day and age there could be teleconferencing or internet
meetings being employed as a way to get the necessary participation. That
may also require a by-law change to do but I would go for an increase in
expense (Yes, dues.) rather than a lowering of standards.
Bob
caws52803@aol.com wrote:
>Thanks Ron for informing the public with this.
>
>
>If I were a delegate, I could call a National meeting to be held at my house
>at 5 am one weekday morning and if I were the only one present, vote to make
>the voting rules?come under Robert's Rules and that a simple majority of
>sitting delegates need to be present for a motion to be voted upon.? Motion
>passed by a majority present!
>
>Hopefully not too much was voted upon in June with this present format.
>Save the important stuff for the meeting in November.
>
>Rudy Streng
>Past Nat'l Pres AHCA
>
>PS: Many national clubs do not finance their delegate's meetings and still
>have a successful and active board of delegates.
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
|