healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Lightened Flywheels

To: "'Bob Spidell'" <bspidell@comcast.net>, "'healeylist'"
Subject: RE: Lightened Flywheels
From: "Michael Salter" <msalter@precisionsportscar.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:38:51 -0500
In addition to the factors you have mentioned a heavy flywheel at held high
RPM when the clutch is dropped will contain a considerable amount of energy
which will add to that available to accelerate the car...
Of course the car will be heavier because of the weight of the flywheel as
well ??????

Michael Salter
http://www.netbug.net/blogmichael/

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-healeys@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-healeys@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of Bob Spidell
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 9:31 PM
To: healeylist
Subject: Lightened Flywheels

Yes, I know this topic has been beaten to death, but something has kept me
wondering. 

I understand that reducing the rotational mass would produce an engine that
would rev quicker--and Listers with lightened flywheels attest to 
this--but does that
yield a car that's quicker off-the-line, or 0 to 60, or in the quarter 
mile?  I ask
because the mass of the flywheel seems inconsequential when compared to the
the mass of the entire drive train, which has to push the weight of the 
car and its
contents.  In other words, the main source of inertia is the rear 
wheels, the weight
riding on said wheels, and the mass of the car that is propelled by the 
rear wheels.

So, does a car with a lightened flywheel REALLY accelerate faster?  Anybody
got before and after 0-60 or quarter-mile times to prove it?


bs

-- 
***************************************************************
Bob Spidell         San Jose, CA        bspidell@comcast.net
'67 Austin-Healey 3000             '56 Austin-Healey 100M
***************************************************************




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>