healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Snopes

To: "'davidwjones'" <davidwjones@cox.net>, dcong996@earthlink.net,
Subject: RE: Snopes
From: John Sims <ahbn6@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:33:07 -0500
And, they are very good at tracing back to the source -- ie the typical that
X person said this at y venue or "as published in xyz medical journal". They
will ferret out the real quote and cite their source which can be verified. 

I take these a step further and when I find that they are incorrect, I blast
a response back to the originator and all of his cc's. Doubt if it stops
them or does any good but it does give me some satisfaction.

I class most, if not all of these emails in the came category as the ones in
which I have won the UK lottery, have a foreign national ready to give me a
bizzilion dollars if I give him my bank account number, etc.


John Sims, BN6
Aberdeen, NJ
www.healey6.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-healeys@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-healeys@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of davidwjones
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:12 AM
To: dcong996@earthlink.net; healeys@autox.team.net
Subject: Snopes

Dallas,
You recently asked why I or anyone would accept Snopes as an authority on
urban legends and various web nonsense..  Good question.
Unless from some well known or authoritative source, --and that source being
verifiable, --I don't take anything on the web at face value.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Snopes, davidwjones
    • RE: Snopes, John Sims <=