When I was in England I stopped by and visited with John Chatham and saw his
famous DD300 Healey. He claimed then (1988) the only original part left on the
car was the license plate and VIN plate. Does that make it counterfeit? Or a
Replicar?
This thought was not to give any ideas, but to make people aware that the
Certificate may not be all it's cracked up to be.
Rudy in NC
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Bittmann <edmyed@harbornet.com>
To: Rich C <richchrysler@quickclic.net>; caws52803@aol.com;
healeys@autox.team.net
Sent: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:58:18 -0800
Subject: Re: Heritage Certificate vs Originality
Speaking of giving bad ideas, if you are a criminal, then why not counterfeit
the entire car. Build from all new parts and then counterfeit the certificate
of a obscure destroyed car. All the dead horses could come mback to life!!
Richard Bittmann BJ7 Tacoma
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rich C" <richchrysler@quickclic.net>
> Jeez Rudy, don't give them any more ideas than they already have!!!<grin>
> Rich C.
> Subject: Heritage Certificate vs Originality
>
>>I would think in this day of exotic copy machines and computer 'cut &
>>>paste' that someone hasn't already doctored their Certificate to represent
>>>the current color of their car.
>> Rudy Streng
>> Lenoir, NC
>> 57 BN4
|