healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1

To: "Healey List" <healeys@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1
From: "Bob Johnson" <robert.w.johnson@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:02:48 -0400
OK, how do you make sure that the vacuum and centrifugal advance are working 
correctly? Also, how much "play" is acceptable in a distributor drive shaft? 
These are questions that have been on my mind a while?

Bob Johnson
BJ8

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <healeys@n4vu.com>
To: "Healey List" <healeys@autox.team.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2005 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: advance ignition timing 3000 MK1


> tnewton wrote:
>> I am sure this has been covered to death over time, but could some one 
>> please
>> confirm a couple of details regarding ignition timing. What is the 
>> general
>> consensus on how much advance seems to be best, and from the TDC timing 
>> mark
>> on the pulley how many millimetres per degree (in other words what is the
>> circumference of the pulley divided by 360.
>> Although my car engine seems to like the present setting, when I checked 
>> the
>> setting it measures  at least one inch (25mm) advanced from TDC - I don't 
>> know
>> what this would be in degrees but I suspect this is a very advanced 
>> level?
>
> Please don't take this as gospel, but just another data point: with an
> engine of this vintage, provided the vacuum and centrifugal advances are
> working, the correct timing is the point at which you can just get it to
> ping under extreme load (typically lugged down beyond the point at which
> you would reasonably operate the engine).  To put it another way, if you
> set the timing to spec with a light, and the engine either pings
> excessively or you can't get it to ping under any circumstances, then
> you might want to consider adjusting the timing away from "spec."
> -- 
> John Miller




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>