healeys
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective

To: Blue One Hundred <international_investor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective
From: Dave & Marlene <rusd@velocitus.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 00:37:25 -0600
Alan,

There are other ligitimate points of view on CO2/global warming. Here is 
one: http://www.clearlight.com/~mhieb/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html
I guess that it depends on the horse you wish to support. Not all have 
been brainwashed into the "green thing". Note particularly that water 
vapor is by far the most significant factor in the green house effect. 
Something that your sources apparently choose to leave out. In my 
opinion, you and the greens are ignoring facts that put global warming 
in proper perspective.  Believe what you will. It will be argued forever.

Dave Russell

Blue One Hundred wrote:
> Mike -
> 
> There are two types of polution - visible (unburnt
> hydrocarbons) and invisible (CO2 - green house
> gasses).
> 
> The proportion between the two varies depending on how
> "clean" you car is, but at the end of the day the
> total wieght of carbon your car puts in the atmosphere
> is directly correspondent to your gas mileage.
> 
> California laws and regulation are totally focused on
> the "visible" pollution... but totally ignores
> invisible pollution (CO2 - greenhouse gas).  So all it
> means are the greens are erroneously focused on
> visible pollution... when in the long run its the
> invisible pollution that matters.

> Regards,
> 
> Alan





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>