Subject: | [Fot] 89MM piston question |
---|---|
From: | Bill at ponostyle.com (Bill) |
Date: | Mon, 3 Sep 2018 07:40:15 -0700 |
References: | <CAMJWJcHsmkMuWwvt1bs3Lax-kTVTkADpdNrFiWUahJDa2r3zsg@mail.gmail.com> <1659c8fa8c2-1ebc-238b@webjas-vaa013.srv.aolmail.net> <90DC3BE5-84AA-4C92-95A5-CA7831825C2C@ponostyle.com> <2F97DC1C-07AC-48FE-8CED-E6E865D4A7DE@ponostyle.com> <002d01d44350$39bb7c20$ad327460$@gmail.com> |
That?s impressive. Now is you could just produce that peak torque at 10,000 RPM you?d have a 314HP motor. Or somehow move the torque peak to 6350 RPM you?d have 200. > On Sep 2, 2018, at 11:34 PM, Chris Marx via Fot <fot at autox.team.net> wrote: > > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Fot] 89MM piston question, Bob Kramer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Fot] 89MM piston question, van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be |
Previous by Thread: | [Fot] 89MM piston question, Bob Kramer |
Next by Thread: | [Fot] 89MM piston question, van.mulders.marcel at telenet.be |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |