I measured the copper ones out of a old AE/Hepolite 2.2 kit, they measure
.017+, not quite .018, and appear to be fairly soft.
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: timmmurphh--- via Fot <fot at autox.team.net>
To: fot <fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Tue, Aug 1, 2017 12:57 pm
Subject: [Fot] Figure 8 gasket thickness
Thanks for the responses to my recent post regarding the thickness of the
figure 8 gaskets. I?ve done a little more ?digging? and these are my results.
All of the steel ones I have of have gotten measure 0.015+. I recently ordered
some non-copper ones from British Parts Northwest and they are aluminum and
also measure 0.015+. These are the first aluminum ones I?ve seen.
All the copper ones I have, including some used ones, measure 0.020+.
I contacted Moss US and asked about their copper ones and any problems. They
only had one report of water leaking, back in 2014. I was told that maybe the
copper 0.020 ones were supposed to compress. I hammered some copper ones to
0.015 and they are twice as wide as the original and would not fit between the
liner and the block bore. Additionally, I don?t think there is enough force to
compress them.
The Moss ones are from Moss UK and are now specified at 0.018 by BPNW. The
BPNW part number is the same as the Moss UK part number. I contacted Moss UK
by email but never got a response.
I also recently ordered a Payen lower engine gasket set and the figure 8
gaskets in it are steel and measure the 0.015+, as all of the other steel ones.
The one engine builder that I know who uses the 0.020 copper gaskets typically
uses them on blocks that are decked with the liner seats cut to allow the 0.003
to 0.005 stick out as specified by the Triumph TR4 Workshop Manual, Pg. 1?121.
I am interested in anybody who is using the copper gaskets. Please post how
you are getting the proper stick out.
For myself, I will continue to use the steel figure 8 gaskets. I would also be
interested in anyone using the aluminum figure 8?s. Any problems? What did
you get for stick out when assembled and the liners clamped in place?
Personally, I don?t think I want to experiment with these.
Tim Murphy
1961 TR4 #317 (It really is a 1961 with an early Commission Number CT511)
_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net
http://www.fot-racing.com
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20170801/63b4a40e/attachment.html>
|