fot
[Top] [All Lists]

[Healeys] Water Pump Pulley Circumference

Subject: [Healeys] Water Pump Pulley Circumference
From: p_cquinn at tpg.com.au (Patrick & Caroline Quinn)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:35:27 +1100
References: <00ee01d2918c$618e2440$24aa6cc0$@tpg.com.au> <9595A767-077E-40BE-843B-D8D8E9848E4B@gmail.com> <002001d291b2$f2ba5670$d82f0350$@homecall.co.uk> <256104F4-B23C-4BA5-B4AA-53BB6B4F6739@gmail.com>
Hello

 

I have found out that the pulley circumference on the very early C-series 
engines is larger. It was changed soon after the first six-cylinder BMC cars 
were released on the market. The engine fitted to our car is within the first 
1,000 C-series engines built and was supplied to the Donald Healey Motor 
Company for their attention.

 

Believe me I would have preferred to rebuild the original pump, but a new 
impeller could not be found. If someone has one I would be very interested.

 

Hoo Roo

 

Patrick Quinn

 

From: Chris Dimmock [mailto:austin.healey at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 1 March 2017 12:27 PM
To: Simon Lachlan
Cc: Patrick & Caroline Quinn
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Water Pump Pulley Circumference

 

Very comprehensive article Simon!

I bought a new pump back in 1998 when the car was rebuilt. When it failed in 
2013, I dug out the original pump and rebuilt it, following the Mike Salter 
instructions. 

I found a NOS bearing, and used a modern seal. The critical dimension is the 
impeller to body clearance of 20 thou. 

Best

Chris

Sent from my iPhone


On 28 Feb. 2017, at 10:08 pm, Simon Lachlan <simon.lachlan at homecall.co.uk> 
wrote:

Good idea, assuming it?s the press-on type.

Certainly, I?ve been led to believe that the County pumps are pretty awful and, 
when my pump started to play up, I went the rebuild route. Didn?t seem worth 
putting in a suspect part, especially one that is so vital.

Interestingly, when I was looking for pump bodies/pulleys that I could rebuild, 
I was given a couple by a friend. Both were County; he?s on his third now. 

I wrote an article for our local club?.waste of print as few, if any, of them 
lift a spanner. However, I attach it herewith. You?ll see that I rely heavily 
on Mike Salter?s good offices ie for info and for parts.

NOS pumps go for a fortune over here, unless you get one for a Wolseley or 
Westie or the like. Then just swap the pulley. See article for more on 
that???but I?d guess both of you are pretty skilled at scavenging from those 
old BMC saloons that our American friends wouldn?t recognize if they were 
parked on their lawn!

Simon

 

From: Healeys [mailto:healeys-bounces at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Chris 
Dimmock
Sent: 28 February 2017 09:53
To: Patrick & Caroline Quinn <p_cquinn at tpg.com.au>
Cc: healeys at autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Healeys] Water Pump Pulley Circumference

 

Hey Patrick, why don't you press the pulley off the old pump and reuse it on 
the new pump?

The only repro water pumps I've bought are the BJ8 ones. They have a pulley 
that just looks totally wrong. Too big & square sided.

Use the old one. 

Best

Chris 

Sent from my iPhone


On 28 Feb. 2017, at 5:32 pm, Patrick & Caroline Quinn <p_cquinn at tpg.com.au> 
wrote:

Greetings

 

Today the new six-cylinder water pump for the BN3 arrived from AH Spares.

 

I have noticed that the ?within-the-groove? circumference of the new pump is 11 
? inches, while the ?within-the-groove? circumference of the old (original) 
pump is 14 inches.

 

Apart from the pump running a little faster I can?t see that it will make for 
any other differences.

 

Does anyone have a pump they can conveniently measure please? Plus any comments 
would be appreciated.

 

Many thanks

 

Patrick Quinn

Blue Mountains, Australia

_______________________________________________
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Healeys at autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys


<Water pump rebuild..docx>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/healeys/attachments/20170301/4ebe8ed8/attachment.html>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>