fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] SVRA to require head and neck restraints

To: "Bob Yule" <autofarm@cyg.net>, "HEALEY LIST"
Subject: Re: [Fot] SVRA to require head and neck restraints
From: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:10:31 -0800
> Nowadays, whenever I
> ride, I wear boots, full leathers, and helmet.  

Perfectly reasonable.  A friend of mine went so far as to show up at an
anti-helmet-law rally wearing his helmet.  When asked WTF, he replied "Being
opposed to the law doesn't mean I'm stupid!"

As I see it, these arguments devolve to whether "freedom" includes the right
to do "stupid" things.  Like ride without a helmet.  Or ride at all for that
matter.

Or drive an old car without air bags, anti-lock brakes, side impact
protection, crush zones, 5 mph bumpers etc etc.

Randall - looking forward to driving a TR3 to work again without so much as
seat belts retrofitted
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

http://www.fot-racing.com

Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>