fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] FW: State of F1

To: "'michael cook'" <mlcooknj@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [Fot] FW: State of F1
From: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:38:00 -0700
While I can't say that I disagree with what you have said, I will have to
point out that we already have a bunch of spec open-wheel series.  What
makes F1 unique is the (rather) openness of their rules.  Closing those
rules down is bound to render the series just another of many spec classes.

If I want to watch a high power V* open wheel class I will watch Indy cars.
But I find that ultimately much more boring than the worst F1 race.

Joe C. 

-----Original Message-----
From: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of michael cook
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 1:19 PM
To: fot@autox.team.net
Subject: [Fot] FW: State of F1

From: mlcooknj@msn.comTo: kaskas@cox.netSubject: RE: [Fot] State of F1Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:44:50 -0400


What Kas is talking about is what works for NASCAR when they run on road
courses. Real racing with strong cars that don't depend on computers to
drive
them. I get tired of the oval track NASCAR parades but you'll find me glued
to
the set when they run at Infineon or the Glen. A lot of people seem to value
F1 primarily for its advanced technology. Yet the high tech level is what
has
reduced the competition level. I watched a bunch of F1 races while Jaguar
was
"competing" and most of them were nap time. No wonder his soap box is
splitting - there's two of us standing on it. Mike > 
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html

http://www.fot-racing.com

Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>