Bill,
Nope, I missed adding the <grin>. Sorry. I've always felt the 3 was an
aerodynamic nightmare, but in reality, it may be better than the 4-6's. It
would be interesting to get a side by side comparison.
I've even more sorry I missed the weekend at Pacific Raceways. Things got
crazy here and I didn't realize it was "that weekend" until Sunday night.
Grrrr. Yeah, I know it's the 4th, but I just didn't "get it".
Sorry for the confusion.
Jack
_____
From: Bill Babcock [mailto:billbab@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 7:41 AM
To: billdentin@aol.com
Cc: jibjib@att.net; fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Fot] drag co-efficient and frontal area data for selected
Triumphs
Jack,
I assume you are serious, do the calculations for drag come apart at higher
drag numbers, like pipe turbulence does?
On Jul 10, 2008, at 6:45 AM, billdentin@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 07/10/2008 12:27:07 AM Central Daylight Time,
jibjib@att.net writes:
Ken,
It's impossible to calculate the Drag Coefficient of a TR3. . . . it's far
too high.
Jack (Ken)...
Drop any decimal, and put your paper in the landscape position.
Bill (Damdinger)
Bill Babcock
Babcock & Jenkins
Billb@bnj.com
503.936.7660
www.bnj.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|