> Yeah, I know, you don't have to tell me. I've tried teaching several
> times during my life and failed miserably every time.
>
> Actually, if you think of the cam as a lever attached to a shaft
> (draw yourself a picture), the longer the lever or further out the
> contact point, the faster the lifter will rise for each degree of
> rotation. The only difference between this and a real cam is that the
> length of the lever is continuously changing as the cam rotates.
>
> With regard to the rest of your comments/suggestions - I don't know.
> There are so many variables and so many ways we can go wrong in this
> stuff. That's why we love it, isn't it?
> Wouldn't it me fun to put one of our valve trains on a Spintron
> machine - http://www.spintron.com/? Does anyone have access to one of
> these?
Jack W. Drews wrote:
>> I must admit that I don't quite understand what you're saying. It
>> must have been taught in one of those math courses I flunked.
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|