>Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:38:24 -0500
>To: Ernest Husmann <ehusmann53@yahoo.com>
>From: "Jack W. Drews" <vinttr4@geneseo.net>
>Subject: Re: [Fot] gearbox legality
>
>I agree that the subject was well thrashed, but at least it was on a
>subject this list was intended for, instead of some of the subjects
>discussed ad nauseum that really should be on the "big" Triumph
>list. It provided some emails good for forwarding to VSCDA officers
>who don't monitor these lists. One could argue that installing a
>different transmission for better reliability is no different than
>installing a Mallory distributor, the only purpose of which is to
>replace Lucas stuff. Hey, all Lucas pieces can be made to work for a
>little while.
>
>Ditto Southwick axles. We could force everybody to replace rear
>axles every third race, just like Kastner did, to keep from rolling
>over. His cars were pretty reliable doing things like that. Why
>can't we do the same thing? If a car a year rolls over and nobody is
>hurt, is it a small price to pay for authenticity?
>
>At 06:35 PM 9/22/2007, you wrote:
>>It's amazing how these threads get off the subject so quickly.
>
>uncle jack
uncle jack
------------------------------------------------
No Virus Found In This Message
Scanned at barracuda.geneseo.net
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|