fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cambridge car for sale

To: "Tony Drews" <tony@tonydrews.com>,
Subject: Re: Cambridge car for sale
From: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:47:35 -0700
Tony, I agree with you. But I bought a car that wasn't raced for ten years
and took it apart, rebuilt it and I'm still getting it to my likings.  The
main advantage I had with this car was it already had a SCCA rollbar, the
interior was mostly finished and it looked like a race car.  I think not
having to strip a street car and find all the problems under the interior
and carpets was probably worth about 6 months time.
Not having raced before I wasn't sure what I might need to do outside the
normal mechanical restoration and safety requirements.  After driving it 2
years I now know what things I need to attend to.  I think I saved thousands
of dollars doing it this way, not to mention the time.  I now have probably
as much in it as it would take to buy a turnkey TR6 racecar, but none of the
joy of building.  I really do enjoy building them, almost as much as driving
them.
Charly
----- Original Message ----- 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Drews" <tony@tonydrews.com>
To: "fot@autox.team.net" <fot@Autox.Team.Net>
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: Cambridge car for sale


> Everyone I know that has bought a Triumph race car already built has had
> some trials and tribulations.  I think I lucked out on mine.  I did have
> some issues related to my own negligence, though.  I think I've taken
apart
> pretty much everything and put it back together the way I wanted in the
> last 2 years.  Not to imply that things were really wrong, just that I
> wanted them to be different.  Maybe the advice would be "buy a car that's
> done, take it apart and put it back together to your liking, and then hit
> the track".  I've probably saved $10K to $15K and 2 to 4 years of part
time
> car construction by buying a well prepared car and then modifying it to
> suit myself over building it from scratch (thanks to R. John Lye).  The
> standard story I hear is "the car was supposed to be race ready, but the
> motor appears to be mostly stock".  When I took mine apart, I kept finding
> more top notch parts than I expected.  That's certainly not the typical
> experience...
>
> I know I'll never get out of the car what I've got into it, but I knew
that
> going in.  It's the price we pay to have the kind of fun and camaraderie
> that this Triumph community provides.  If someone wanted my car, it would
> be in the Cambridge zone before I'd even consider selling it.
>
> - Tony Drews
>
> At 05:09 PM 10/1/2004, Larry Young wrote:
> >I've never been successful at finding a car that was done.  I've found
> >ones that LOOK done, but they normally have some hidden sins.  When I
> >start going through it, I usually find some real odd mechanics, e.g.
> >distributors wired wrong, camshafts installed wrong, etc.  If it's a car
> >I'm going to keep forever, I'd rather build it myself, even though it
will
> >cost more.  Then I know what I've got.
> >Larry Young
> >
> >Bill Babcock wrote:
> >
> >>And it's
> >>why the best kind of car project to buy is one that's done

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>