fot
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Moldex Crank, Bearing width, Rods

To: Richtr@erols.com, fot@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Moldex Crank, Bearing width, Rods
From: "MARK J WEATHERS" <markjwea@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:39:31 +0000
Would a girdle that spans the bottom of the block help? I remember 
researching the Rover/Buick 215ci V8 engine and I saw that racers sometimes 
bolted a plate between the bottom of the crank and the oil pan to keep the 
block from flexing and cracking. This was on earlier castings when the 
displacement was taken up to the max, before webbing changes were 
introduced.

Mark Weathers


>From: "Dean Tetterton" <Richtr@erols.com>
>Reply-To: "Dean Tetterton" <Richtr@erols.com>
>To: "Friends of Triumph" <fot@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Moldex Crank, Bearing width, Rods
>Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:12:59 -0400
>
>OK so we build a crank that last and rods that don't break. Now what block 
>are
>we going to put it in?
>I am seeing a lot of cracked blocks in the webbing between 2 & 3 and 
>radiating
>out from the center
>main. I think with crank flex, there is block flex and they all take their
>toll. IN the dark ages, early
>to mid 60's, it was common to limit revs to 6500 and change cranks after 
>every
>4 race weekends. When
>taken out they usually showed cracks in the 4th rod bearing or rear main. 
>Back
>then new cranks were
>  around $400 and a lot of those cracked crankshafts were put in street 
>motors
>and lasted for years.
>
>So now we all promise to keep our rev's below 6000 and we all have a good
>time.....of course when
>that 356 is in your mirror that goes out the window.  How about it Henry?
>Promise to shift at 6000?
>
>Dean

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>