I think you have just reached the conclusion that is correct in this
matter..
----- Original Message -----
From: <greenman62@hotmail.com>
To: <chusmann@execpc.com>; <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>
Cc: <BillDentin@aol.com>; <EISANDIEGO@aol.com>; <fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: What Are SCCA Racecars using For Axles ?
> From: Ernest Husmann <chusmann@execpc.com>
> >Reply-To: Ernest Husmann <chusmann@execpc.com>
> >To: "R. John Lye" <rjl6n@server1.mail.virginia.edu>
> >CC: BillDentin@aol.com, EISANDIEGO@aol.com, fot@autox.team.net
> >Subject: Re: What Are SCCA Racecars using For Axles ?
> >Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2000 09:06:42 -0500
> >
> > > >The logic escapes me.
> > >
> > > Logic? You want logic? Come on, man, this is the SCCA!
> >
> >Having studied the SCCA's General Competion Rules (GCR), I don't believe
> >that logic is required in order to keep the playing field level
> >(relatively speaking of course). Also, let's remember that this is all
> >relative to fairness, promotions and exposure.
> >
> >My $0.02.
> >
> >Ernie Husmann
>
> My take on it is "why should they be accomodating for obsolete
> sportscars?" The average guy just can't haul off to the
> dealership and pick up a TR. Besides, it's probably been a long
> time since they got any promotional "money" from Triumph, MG,
> Healey, etc. I can imagine someone in the front office
> thinking "When are these guys gonna just go away?"
>
> Greg
>
> Greg Petrolati Champaign, Illinois 1962 TR4 (CT4852L)
>
> That's not a leak... My car's just marking its territory...
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
|