| To: | Catpusher@AOL.COM, fot@autox.team.net, rjl6n@virginia.edu |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Rotoflex rear suspension |
| From: | cak@dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev) |
| Date: | Tue, 14 Apr 1998 12:16:17 -0700 |
Certainly many of the Can-Am cars used some version of Rotoflex in their driveline - I know the McLarens did. But I suspect they had a bit better geometry there than Triumph used. I'm always amazed that the couplings were put in such a position that they are *always* being compressed, even at rest at standard ride height. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Rotoflex rear suspension, R. John Lye |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Oh-oh-flex rear suspension, Malaboge |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Rotoflex rear suspension, R. John Lye |
| Next by Thread: | GT6 Stuff, Alexander Joseph H |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |