| To: | Paul Courson <cour.jpeg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Roadsters] Request some thoughts 70 vs 67.5 |
| From: | Stan Chernoff <az589@lafn.org> mail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:03:32 -0700 |
| Cc: | "datsun-roadsters: autox.team. net" <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net> |
| Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
| Delivered-to: | datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net |
| References: | <8D08396893B4C64-2450-1084F@webmail-m142.sysops.aol.com> <523C4813.9724.60CDA39@localhost> <1379714409.87304.YahooMailNeo@web181402.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAAC0-o4_p3k68emCg3HL6AhvoBv_Gkd7fuDpi-J=1sgN0bhnhw@mail.gmail.com> |
I just happens that the 67.5 1600's and 2000's all had 5 main bearing metric engines and dual circuit brake master cylinders. Stan At 05:33 PM 9/20/2013, Paul Courson wrote: >There's a minor style advantage to the 67.5 over the '70 in my view. I come >from a delightful '66 Austin-Healey and I prefer the pre-68 311 dash and >lower windshield. > >But the 5-bearing 1600 and the dual circuit brakes have tipped me towards >the 68-70 over the years. Plus, when shopping, there were far more good >examples to pick from with the 68-70 series. > >Paul ________________________________________ datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/datsun-roadsters/mharc@autox.team.net |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Roadsters] early 67 dashboard screws, Dave |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Roadsters] New Falkens (was "High Windshield Horn Spring"), ppeters914 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Roadsters] Request some thoughts 70 vs 67.5, Paul Courson |
| Next by Thread: | [Roadsters] early 67 dashboard screws, Dave |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
