datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Is this really the 73rd one produced?

To: BARTERDUDE@aol.com
Subject: Re: Is this really the 73rd one produced?
From: Ron Hamilton <fj201@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:46:52 -0700
Interesting question as I have  spl 310-3-00205 and it is titled as a 
1962 and was a single carb.

Ron

BARTERDUDE@aol.com wrote:
> Okay guys, even I am confused.  I recently acquired a 1500 Fairlady and do 
> believe according to what all the information indicates, that this is one of 
>the 
> earliest 1500 on the list.  The serial number is SPL 310-300161C.  But where 
> I am confused is supposedly the factory started numbering the first 1500's at 
> either 300088 or 000088 and the letter just indicates the production area 
> parking lot at the factory, but where the confusion comes in is, I thought 
>the 
> first 300 produced came with the single carb, which has the dash plate 
>showing 77 
> hp as my other 1500 shows.  This car is stamped 1964 (yes I know they stamped 
> the early ones, when sold), but it is also showing 85 HP, which is dual carb 
> rating.
> 
> This car had NO carbs so I don't know which is correct, but I do have an 
> intake manifold and single carb set up.  I also hear that they did retrofit 
>the 
> singles to duels a little later, but I was wondering if anyone could shed 
>some 
> definitive light on the production date and if this is indeed the earliest on 
> the list (to date).  I know Carl Jaegar has the earliest one (based on 
>starting 
> at 88) on the roadster registry with 173 (the 85th one produced), but if my 
> assumption are correct this is the 73rd one produced and worth restoring (its 
> going to take some work).
> 
> Any insight and help would be greatly appreciated,
> 
> 
> Gary Lasater
> founding member www.wycroc.org
> 63 SPL 310-300161C
> 63 SPL 310-300289B
> 69/70 SRL 2000
> 70 SPL 311 1600






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>