Hello,
If you know thta you are going to do that I would get a late model
roadster without the running gear. Or get a 1600 as they are usualy cheaper
than 2000's. 69's and 70's are probabaly what you want. Low windshields are
rarer and more expensive and parts are harder to get I would say.
Daniel 69 2000
SF CA (for 1 more day)
> To all,
>
> Hypothetical situation: suppose I don't yet own a Roadster
> (true, that) and I've decided that whatever roadster I get
> will probably not be for restoring. Instead, I plan to
> install a different engine completely than what came in
> them. Maybe even something on the large side, like a 3.3L
> engine. I like the low windshield ones, but for the sake of
> this one, let's assume there's no partiality. My question
> would be - Is there a particular year that has a better
> (stronger, easier to get parts, etc.) year to start with, or
> are they all engineered about the same? What year car would
> be a good candidate if you were looking at it this way?
>
> Oh, and I have to say thanks for all the input ya'll have
> given to me. I don't think it's said enough, but this is
> truely a GREAT group of people. I'm glad I joined.
>
> Thom
>
> /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
> /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
> /// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> /// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
|